Join

or

Existing user? Login

The new NHS Patient Safety Strategy has a big hole in it

In August 2018, I expressed my concern in Clinical Pharmacist that the NHS, described as ‘an organisation with a memory’, was losing its patient safety memory and not addressing many important risks effectively[1]. Other reports from the Care Quality Commission[2] and the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch[3] also identified shortcomings in how patient safety was being managed in the NHS in England.

A new NHS Patient Safety Strategy for England was published in July 2019[4]. There are some proposals that I can support (for example, broadening the ways to acquire, exchange and analyse patient safety data, and developing a universal safety curriculum for all NHS staff). But just like in James Reason’s ‘Swiss cheese model’ (used to illustrate the flaws in barriers to prevent errors[5]), there is a significant hole in the new NHS Patient Safety Strategy that will leave patients at risk of known errors, many of which involve medicines.

The new strategy says that the existing reporting system and a new national reporting system will be analysed by NHS Improvement for new and unknown risks to patient safety, and patient safety alerts will be issued to assist the NHS in addressing these risks.

The document also states that patient safety alerts are not an appropriate response for known, ‘wicked’ risks. This raises uncertainty over the status of previous alerts published by the National Patient Safety Agency and NHS England; for example, those concerning strong potassium infusions, methotrexate, wrong-route errors and omitted medicine doses.

Although there is evidence that implementation of patient safety guidance published in previous alerts has been poor in the NHS[6], where is the evidence that the guidance in previously published alerts was not effective if implemented as intended?

What are these “wicked” risks that are supposed to be well known? They would be better known if there was greater transparency by NHS Improvement of the 2 million patient safety incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System each year. What are the most frequently reported risks and most severe harms in each category? What safeguards are in place for these risks?

The majority of these “wicked” risks are not addressed by the National Patient Safety Improvement Programme. How will the NHS respond to patients and their families harmed by these “wicked” risks in the future? NHS Improvement needs to provide guidance on how known risks that are not part of the National Improvement Programme should be managed in the NHS in future.

 

David Cousins, independent consultant in safe medication practice

 

A spokesperson for the NHS said:

“Actually, the NHS is a world leader in patient safety, having recently published the first comprehensive strategy to improve safety, including embracing new technology with a new and more transparent patient safety reporting system, a medication safety programme to provide focused and long-term support, and the introduction of patient safety specialists to work alongside medication safety officers in every NHS organisation, all of which will empower front line staff to make decisions about the best way to improve patient safety rather than relying only on top-down instructions.”

Background: The new National Patient Safety Alerting Committee will oversee all patient safety alerts to ensure they are of the highest standards to mitigate risks. The Care Quality Commission will also review them during inspections.

 

Citation: Electronicjuice DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2019.20206882

Readers' comments (1)

  • A succinct point about 'wicked' risks by Mr Cousins. Such risks need to be communicated in a clear and defined manner to all medicine and pharmacy sectors.

    Unfortunately, I cannot glean much information from the NHS single structured sentence response here as a medication safety program should already be in place. I'm interested to know how patient safety officers will help in the process. Medicine safety should be a well defined and simple process to reduce inertia in getting the information out to clinicians.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

For commenting, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will have the ability to comment.

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Patient Care in Community Practice

    Patient Care in Community Practice is a unique, practical guide for healthcare professionals or carers. Covers a range of non-medicinal products suitable for use at home.

    £22.00
  • Pharmaceutical Toxicology

    Explains the methodology and requirements of pre-clinical safety assessments of new medicines. Includes registration requirements and pharmacovigilance.

    £40.00
  • Paediatric Drug Handling

    Written for new pharmaceutical scientists, this book provides a background in paediatric pharmacy and a comprehensive introduction to children's medication.

    £33.00
  • Introduction to Renal Therapeutics

    Introduction to Renal Therapeutics covers all aspects of drug use in renal failure. Shows the role of the pharmacist in patient care for chronic kidney disease.

    £38.00
  • Foundation in Pharmacy Practice

    A practical and succinct overview of the principal pharmacy practice topics, for new pharmacy students.

    £33.00

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

Powered by MedicinesComplete
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

Newsletter Sign-up

Want to keep up with the latest news, comment and CPD articles in pharmacy and science? Subscribe to our free alerts.