What defines a sufficient work break?
After being approached by several colleagues about the issue of what constitutes a sufficient work break, I have an answer that is in line with the “Working time directive”. I have taken into account the advice that Lord Fraser has given with respect to the issue of a pharmacist being absent from a pharmacy.
However, I would like to invite the superintendent pharmacists and, indeed, all pharmacists to clarify what, in their experiences, defines a sufficient work break. With that in mind, I would like to start the issue with the following, which after a discussion with a colleague, was the answer that I received. I present this to colleagues who ask my humble opinion on this issue.
A sufficient work break constitutes the following: a break, away from the pharmacy and away from any matters to deal with pharmacy, for 10 minutes in the morning, 30 minutes at lunchtime and a further 10-minute break in the afternoon.
Hopefully, this is the starting point from which we can all work. I hope that my request for a discussion of this issue is not disregarded and that a policy may be devised which can be acted upon regarding this important issue. I now ask for the opinions of my colleagues.
Citation: Electronicjuice URI: 10020262
Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press
This new edition of Dale and Appelbe's Pharmacy and Medicines Law is the definitive guide to law and ethics for pharmacy practice in the UK. It covers law and professional regulation and is firmly established as the definitive student textbook and reference work on this subject in the UK. Fully updated to include changes to pharmacy laws and regulation.£57.00